|
FrontLine
|
|
|
|
The Online Newsletter
of the National Council of Social Security Management Associations,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
NCSSMA Home Page |
|

|
|
July 2005
- Issue 16 |
|
|
|
|
 |
In
this Issue:
|
|

|
|
Ron Buffaloe
|
President's
Message
By Ron Buffaloe
NCSSMA President
As I travel about the country speaking at the regional association
annual meetings I explain how we determine what our five or six
key issues are each year, give a status report on each item,
and talk about how our standing committees, national Executive
Committee, and officers have to keep those issues at the forefront,
as they guide the association's activities for the year.
These five or six (or more) key
issues are often long range goals—issues that we know may take
more than one year to accomplish, such as securing adequate
staffing resources for the field or improving the equity of
the field management grade structure. They arise from our yearly
resolutions process, starting with proposals from individual
members that work their way through a regional association,
are submitted at the annual meeting, are debated and adopted,
and set the agenda for the National Council for the next year.
While we all know these key items are important and need to
be worked on nationally, I was recently asked to talk to the
members of a regional association about some of the other reasons
it is important to have a national management association. I
would like to share with you why I think a national management
association is vital to every field manager.
One, certainly, is to give attention
to the many other issues important to field management that
are time sensitive, that can't wait years for a resolution.
The last six months seem to have provided more than the usual
number of “opportunities” to bring
issues forward to the leaders of SSA, to respond to issues the
agency is initiating, and to have an impact on decisions directly
affecting field managers. Looking back, I am amazed at the variety
of activities and issues with which we have dealt since last
October.
These include letters we have initiated on subjects like the
agency's suggestions system, fugitive felon recontacts, space
issues, and SSN verification for third parties, just to name
a few, and major position papers we have written on a two year
probationary period for new hires, training in field offices,
and the problems of single manager offices.
Another important role we play is being able to name members
to serve on national workgroups set up by the major components
of the agency. In the last six months we've been asked to be
a part of seven national workgroups and committees, including
the Medical CDR Intercomponent Team, the Leadership Strategy
Workgroup, the Time Allocation System workgroup, the eTravel
Workgroup, the Operations IT Strategic Vision for Programmatic
Systems Workgroup, the 2006 Deputy Commissioner for Operations
(DCO) Operating Plan Workgroup, and the National TSC Steering
Committee. On these workgroups we are able to propose ideas and
to argue against other ideas, with the goal being to have the
final workgroup recommendations improve the situation for field
managers.
These opportunities to be involved
in or to have an impact on decisions being made that impact
field management just would not be possible if you did not
have a viable, active national management association. The
elected officers, Executive Committee, thirteen standing committees,
and numerous workgroup volunteers all work together, hand in
hand with the ten regional management associations, to be the “unfiltered voice of management” in
SSA.
I could pick many examples over the past six months but would
like to give just one example of how the input of your national
management association has positively impacted field managers.
On February 24, 2005, a member alerted us to significant changes
in the reporting requirements for Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests in field offices. We would have to start keeping
stroke tallies of an expanded list of items that met the definition
of an FOIA request, retroactive back to 10/01/04, and post the
information monthly to a website. On February 25, after talking
to the Office of General Counsel, Office of Public Disclosure,
we protested to DCO that the reporting would be administratively
burdensome, time consuming, and certainly inaccurate for the
first two quarters of FY2005.
That same day DCO advised that they would check out the new
reporting requirements. On March 2 DCO responded, thanked us
for bringing the issue to their attention, explained that they
had not been involved in and were not previously aware of the
policy change, gave us information on how the new reporting requirements
had been developed by the various Central Office components that
had been involved, and advised that the policy had been rescinded,
pending resolution of some other issues. We were informed that
the regions would be told of this change, a draft proposal would
be written with new instructions for field offices, the draft
proposal would be shared with us, and that our suggestions on
the new draft would be appreciated.
On April 7 the draft proposal was shared with the National Council
along with a request for comments. The new proposal was to remove
the FOIA reporting requirements from the field and to replace
them with a centralized data collection process. The proposal
was reviewed in detail by the National Council Management Committee
and on April 13 we wrote to DCO expressing our appreciation for
the effort to change the FOIA reporting requirements and giving
our support for the new proposal.
While not every issue turns out this well for our association,
we have had great success in bringing many of the concerns of
our members to the attention of the agency, and through submitting
emails, letters, papers, and serving on workgroups get to a resolution
with which everyone can live. This, along with developing a rapport
and feeling of mutual trust with the agency's leaders, is something
that can only be done through your management association.
Top

|

Pictured above are Pete Neumann and Maria Steele, retired SSA
managers and current Peace Corps volunteers, along with Sister
Juliana Manele who runs St. Camillus House in Lesotho, South Africa.
St. Camillus House is an HIV/AIDS home based care organization.
|
Check Day in Lesotho
By Pete Neumann, DM, (retired)
Former President of the NESSMA/
Current Peace Corps Volunteer
Editor's Note: The husband and wife team, Pete Neumann and
Maria Steele, are retired District Mangers from the Boston
Region. In their retirement, Pete and Maria joined the Peace
Corps and are currently working in Lesotho, South Africa. Pete
recently shared with us what social security check day is like
in Lesotho.
Even though I am nearly 3 years retired from
the Social Security Administration, the brain cells still retain
a little. Our system pays benefits based on work – with the
amount determined by how much we earn and for how long we worked.
The Social Security Administration also administers a federal
needs based welfare program called Supplemental Security Income,
or SSI. These benefits are based on need and either age or
disability. A work history is not needed. The Lesotho system
is closer to the SSI program.
In Lesotho, you can receive a benefit of 150 maloti per month
if you are 75 years or older. It does not matter if you worked
some, a lot, or not at all. Whether you have other income or
resources is also not a factor. The reality is that there is
no other income and resources. If you are 75, you get the 150
Maloti. A maloti is Lesotho currency. A Loti (maloti is more
than one) is exactly equivalent to the South African Rand. 150
maloti equals about $25.
Here's how you collect it. Remember, you
are 75 years old……..
Each month you present yourself to a designated
post office bringing your identity papers – these papers have your photo
and establish your age. At the post office, you stand in lines – or
what looks mostly like a crowd, but is called lines. You will
likely be in lines that last for days. You will be with other
elders like yourself and armed policeman. They are there not
for crowd control, but for security – to keep the post office
from being robbed since benefits are paid in cash. At the end
of the day, if you have not collected your benefit, you must
find a place to sleep. Police stations sometimes offer shelter.
Others go to friends who happen to live close by. Otherwise,
you would return to your village, no matter where that is. You
would walk or take a crowded taxi and then come back to the post
office the next day. You get in a line to await your turn and
maybe go home again that night to return again.
The lines are not organized in any pattern
I recognize. There is no head of the line, middle or end that
I can see. They seem more like a mass of people grouped on
all sides of the post office. Somehow there is order and people
in these “lines” do not crane
their necks to see who's next or press in any particular direction
for advantage or bicker or gripe. They wait.
The post office in Mohales Hoek looks like
it might be part of a set for a cowboy movie. It is a one story
building that is dark, creaky with wooden flooring and old
and dirty stucco walls. There are a few benches inside placed
in front of a waist high counter. On top of the counter are
steel barred windows where business is conducted. When you
finally get inside, you wait for the clerk to signal you to
come forward. You present yourself along with your identity
papers. Your name is checked on the registry (how you got on
the registry in the first place is another story). If
you are really you and you are due the benefit, you work your
hand through the bars so the postal clerk can grab it to ink
your thumb. The clerk then presses your thumb to a spot beside
your name on the registry. You get your money and head home.
You get to do this every month. Rain, snow, hail are not factors.
No direct deposit, no conducting business by phone, no internet
filing. You go and you hope you do not wait too long. More
than that, you hope that your name is on the list.
Top

|

Greg Heineman
|
Dental
Plan joins Telephone Service as a NCSSMA Member Benefit
By: Greg Heineman, Chairman, NCSSMA Communications Committee
District Manager, Norfolk NE
Over the years, NCSSMA has looked to provide discounted services
to benefit our members. For years we have sponsored discount
telephone services through Cognigen INC, and many members have
enjoyed significant savings on their phone bill as a result of
this relationship. Cognigen offers low cost and flat rate long
distance plans, with rates as low as 2.7 cents a minute. Broadband,
calling card and cellular services are also available. I encourage
you to read more about Cognigen's services at http://www.ld.net/?ncssma .
Recently NCSSMA entered into a relationship
with AmeriPlan Dental Services to provide discounted dental
services to our members and friends. For a fee as low as $11.95
per month for an individual and $19.95 per month for a family,
you can take advantage of significant discounts for dental
services from AmeriPlan dentists. Some of these discounts can
save you up to 80% of the cost of certain procedures. To learn
more you can visit AmeriPlan's web site for NCSSMA members
at: http://www.MyBenefitsPluscom/12663129 .
Using a NCSSMA sponsored plan for telephone services or dental
care helps you by saving money. It also helps support NCSSMA, as
NCSSMA receives a small commission for each member signing up for
the service. This income is used to support activities such as
FrontLine, NCSSMA.org, and our other informational activities inside
and outside of Social Security. So if you're looking to save money,
and help NCSSMA at the same time, give these plans a look!
Top

|
|
Editor's Corner
By Phil Walton
We Get Letters
We received considerable positive feedback from around the country
on the Organizational Dissonance editorial in the last edition.
Thank you.
Not surprisingly, those giving feedback did not care to bare
their souls publicly. I guess that's why I have been editor of
MASS Media and FrontLine for ten years. No one else wants the
job.
Here are some excerpts, sanitized to avoid identification:
The staffing decisions that have been
made over the past several years within SSA remind me of
the old saying about “too
many cooks.” With more and more “cook” positions to point out
workloads that need attention, we are constantly running from
pillar to post and back again.. There is constant, unrelenting
pressure and stress caused by individuals whose only reason
for getting up in the morning is to point out where you are
falling down during the day.
The bottom line is we have considerably more work than we
have capacity to move it.
Yet there are positions whose only mission
in life seems to be to point out workloads we may not be
keeping up with. We
get lists to work so we can remove the "stuck" cases. We
are asked to review lists that are informational in nature. And
don't forget to cover that S08 with an S06. And if you
haven't caught your tail yet, there are still prisoner workloads
and RPS/PUPS issues to deal with.
We survive due to the hard work and dedication
of the staff, without which we wouldn't move any work at
all. The
ultimate irony is if we had the appropriate staff to meet
the public service needs, we wouldn't need all those cooks
in the first place. .
Staffing 101
No matter the issue under discussion, field office staffing
comes up somewhere, somehow in the course of things. And it should.
It is the fundamental issue involved in service delivery. SSA
has created a vast science of it all--- DOWR, DOWS, SUMS, etc.
--- how much staff one field office gets versus another is portrayed
as a vast and complex scientific undertaking.
There are no doubt more FTE's devoted to
monitoring this vast system than we would care to know about.
Hours upon hours can be spent understanding how this system
works. But we need to back up to the baseline, rudimentary
questions: SSA overall has over 64,000 FTE's budgeted. About
34,500 of these are in field operations. That starting number
is the threshold issue, long before the pseudo-science of how
to divide it up. Every FTE in field operations is based on
work units. What formula, what science is used to determine
the starting point, the overall allocation to the field? What
formula is used to determine how many FTE's are in headquarters
and all the other non-field, support components? How many high
impact, public contact and public service organizations have
nearly half of their total FTE's not involved in direct service
delivery? What is their ratio of overhead positions to service
delivery positions? For some years now there has been a focus
on the ratio of field office management positions to field
office frontline positions. Given the duties most field office
management performs, the term overhead is a horrible misnomer.
Overhead people do not interview, clear claims and do the mail.
What ratio of non-field overhead is desirable? Look at other
public and private organizations and see how SSA stacks up with
half of their employees “supporting” those on the front lines.
Top

|

|
Phil
Walton, FrontLine Editor
Four SeaGate, Suite 1000
Toledo, OH 43604
Phone: 419-259-7300
Fax: 419-259-2056
Email: frontline-Editor@ncssma.org
|
|
|
|
|
|